Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1654861
| From | Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: imx6q: provide documentation for new fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff property |
| Date | 2017-06-01 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNsfo-7wq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tN597-16T-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN597-16T-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNdgl-6b3-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 31.05.2017 um 16:52 schrieb Mark Rutland: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 08:14:52AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> >> Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> >> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> >> Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt >> index 9252912a5b0e..214cb5f461c7 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/imx6q-clock.txt >> @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Required properties: >> - interrupts: Should contain CCM interrupt >> - #clock-cells: Should be <1> >> >> +Optional properties: >> +- fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff: Configure CCM to assert PMIC_STBY_REQ signal >> + on power off. > > s/_/-/ in property names, please. ok. I have now some more questions: what naming schema should be actually used? fsl,pmic-stby-poweroff or fsl,pmic-stby-power-off i found some existing case: sound/rt5660.txt:- realtek,poweroff-in-suspend so in my case it will be: fsl,standby-in-poweroff or fsl,standby-in-power-off can we have generic name for this use case? should I use same binding for PMIC and the SoC or they should be more like: for SoC "standby-in-power-off" and for PMIC "power-off-in-standby" > When/why is this needed? > > Why should a DT author (not) set this? > > Thanks, > Mark. > >> + >> The clock consumer should specify the desired clock by having the clock >> ID in its "clocks" phandle cell. See include/dt-bindings/clock/imx6qdl-clock.h >> for the full list of i.MX6 Quad and DualLite clock IDs. >> -- >> 2.11.0 >> -- Regards, Oleksij
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: imx6q: provide documentation for new fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff property Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-05-31 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: imx6q: provide documentation for new fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff property Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-05-31 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: imx6q: provide documentation for new fsl,pmic_stby_poweroff property Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de> - 2017-06-01 09:00 +0200
csiph-web