Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1655951

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and 4k)

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/01/2017 02:59 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
>> index d4d409b..b22c2b6 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
>> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static inline pgste_t ptep_xchg_start(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>  {
>>  	pgste_t pgste = __pgste(0);
>>  
>> -	if (mm_has_pgste(mm)) {
>> +	if (pgtable_has_pgste(mm, __pa(ptep))) {
>>  		pgste = pgste_get_lock(ptep);
>>  		pgste = pgste_pte_notify(mm, addr, ptep, pgste);
>>  	}
>> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static inline pte_t ptep_xchg_commit(struct mm_struct *mm,
>>  				    unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
>>  				    pgste_t pgste, pte_t old, pte_t new)
>>  {
>> -	if (mm_has_pgste(mm)) {
>> +	if (pgtable_has_pgste(mm, __pa(ptep))) {
>>  		if (pte_val(old) & _PAGE_INVALID)
>>  			pgste_set_key(ptep, pgste, new, mm);
>>  		if (pte_val(new) & _PAGE_INVALID) 
> 
> I think these two checks are wrong. We really have to test here the
> mapcount bit only (relying on mm_has_pgste(mm) is wrong in case global
> vm.allocate_pgste ist set).
> 
> But before I continue working on this, I think it makes sense to clarify
> if something like that would be acceptable at all.

I think that is up to Martin to decide. Given the fact that Fedora, SUSE, Ubuntu always
enable this sysctl when the qemu package is installed (other distros as well?) I think 
that we should really think about changing things. I see 2 options:

1. dropping 2k page tables completely
pro:	- simplifies pagetable code (e.g. look at page_table_alloc code)
	- we could get rid of a lock in the pgtable allocation path (mm->context.pgtable_lock)
	- I am not aware of any performance impact due to the 4k page tables
	- transparent for old QEMUs
	- KVM will work out of the box
con: 	- higher page table memory usage for non-KVM processes

2. go with your approach
pro: 	- lower page table memory usage for non-KVM processes
	- KVM will work out of the box
	- no addtl overhead for non-KVM processes
con:	- higher overhead for KVM processes during paging (since we are going to use IPTE
	or friends anyway, the question is: does it matter?)
	- needs QEMU change

Christian

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-05-29 18:40 +0200
  [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: s390: Introduce KVM_VM_S390_LATE_MMAP David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-05-29 18:40 +0200
  [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and 4k) David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-05-29 18:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and  4k) Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-01 13:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and  4k) David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and  4k) David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 15:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] s390x: mm: allow mixed page table types (2k and  4k) Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-01 12:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-01 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 13:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 10:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 09:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 11:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 12:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 13:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 15:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-07 14:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 12:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable  vm.alloc_pgste Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> - 2017-06-02 12:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid having to enable vm.alloc_pgste David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-06-02 13:00 +0200

csiph-web