Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1655880
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | linux-next: upcoming conflict between the target-updates and target-bva trees |
| Date | Fri, 02 Jun 2017 05:40:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNLBn-3BC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1496374769; bh=H2tdxXFhtzFF2/Wisv20f9Eff0FtMS3iVpUVmW/IX0s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=T3o3zK73cwvB/X09+E1LCRts4ql/VmbXxaR21TQquGD0HVBeDYvAyq0GL+hy4utye N3rX4CnsMqQ7u8NKnKbsz+LoZJaTN7ueI1YM1og/sBcW6sVBr/2A7bEiwKKrZFMlPd +cA80rUEEzFoqCyE8F6khSE/xCaudQoYMyHwde/t1WWc+dnVdxBMepiScAWx3n44SB J9FNMNrmPRhmEhF+NiVAfvN5tElTnVe/l0cSZuZwVzVy7On73sWURDngWqDCxwNQ0z bQYrrHVaZv9TY0Cq8L/DH9kcXRf1fSPkAap7r15WSgXn7eEYbceKRoB3PKkjV8aNqe ya3yKVXLyFE6Q== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=US-ASCII |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 13 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 2 Jun 2017 13:39:28 +1000 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20170602133928.2afa3e7a@canb.auug.org.au> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1655880 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi all, Last night the tagret-bva tree was rebased on top of the target-updates tree. Just now, part of the target-updates tree has been rewritten. So now I expect to get conflict(s) when I merge these trees since the commits in the target-updates tree are no longer the same as those that the target-bva tree was rebased on top of. Please take a little time to sort out your development process. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: upcoming conflict between the target-updates and target-bva trees Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-02 05:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: upcoming conflict between the target-updates and target-bva trees "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org> - 2017-06-02 06:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: upcoming conflict between the target-updates and target-bva trees Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> - 2017-06-02 07:20 +0200
csiph-web