Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1655807

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the target-updates tree

From Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the target-updates tree
Date 2017-06-02 01:30 +0200
Message-ID <tNHHr-RH-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tNpKx-65D-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNqwW-6Ht-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNqwW-6Ht-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNHHr-RH-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Bart,

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:14:06 -0700 Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com> wrote:
>
> On 05/31/17 22:04, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Go ahead and get list review on drivers/target/ changes before pushing
> > them into linux-next, please.
> > 
> > Btw, I don't care if you queue up one's that do have at least two
> > Reviewed-bys into your tree, but everything that doesn't have
> > Reviewed-bys or Acked-by should not be going into linux-next.  
> 
> It is not your job to rewrite the rules for linux-next. I'm following
> the guidelines I received from Stephen in December 2016. You were copied
> on the e-mail with guidelines Stephen sent to me. See also
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg38488.html.
> 
> Stephen, if anything would have changed in the meantime that I'm not
> aware of please let me know.

This is what I tell everyone:

"You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary."

Which is just what was in that message you pointed to.  Note the
"reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree)".  This
is more meant for the top level maintainers, but implies that the
patches have been reviewed, tested and are as ready as possible for
merging into the next level up tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-01 06:20 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org> - 2017-06-01 06:30 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com> - 2017-06-01 07:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org> - 2017-06-01 07:20 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@sandisk.com> - 2017-06-01 07:10 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org> - 2017-06-01 07:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-06-02 01:30 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the target-bva tree with the  target-updates tree "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org> - 2017-06-02 06:00 +0200

csiph-web