Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1655732
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 08/55] KVM: arm64: Set virtual EL2 context depending on the guest exception level |
| Date | Thu, 01 Jun 2017 22:30:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tNETg-7v6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sXBCV-wl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sXBCV-wl-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Dmarc-Filter | OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com E2E79232076 |
| Authentication-Results | ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com |
| Authentication-Results | ext-mx09.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bsd@redhat.com |
| Dkim-Filter | OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com E2E79232076 |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| X-Scanned-By | MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 |
| X-Greylist | Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 01 Jun 2017 20:22:26 +0000 (UTC) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 73 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, vladimir.murzin@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, kevin.brodsky@arm.com, wcohen@redhat.com, shankerd@codeaurora.org, geoff@infradead.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, anna-maria@linutronix.de, shihwei@cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 01 Jun 2017 16:22:17 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <jpgtw3zzcee.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> |
| X-Original-References | <1483943091-1364-1-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu> <1483943091-1364-9-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1655732 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> writes:
> From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
>
> Set up virutal EL2 context to hardware if the guest exception level is
> EL2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/context.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> index 320afc6..acb4b1e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/context.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,25 @@
> void kvm_arm_setup_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
> + if (unlikely(vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu))) {
> + ctxt->hw_pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & ~PSR_MODE_MASK;
>
> - ctxt->hw_pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
> - ctxt->hw_sys_regs = ctxt->sys_regs;
> - ctxt->hw_sp_el1 = ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1;
> + /*
> + * We emulate virtual EL2 mode in hardware EL1 mode using the
> + * same stack pointer mode as the guest expects.
> + */
> + if ((*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) & PSR_MODE_MASK) == PSR_MODE_EL2h)
> + ctxt->hw_pstate |= PSR_MODE_EL1h;
> + else
> + ctxt->hw_pstate |= PSR_MODE_EL1t;
> +
I see vcpu_mode(el2) does
return mode == PSR_MODE_EL2h || mode == PSR_MODE_EL2t;
I can't seem to find this, what's the difference between
the modes: PSR_MODE_EL2h/EL2t ?
Bandan
> + ctxt->hw_sys_regs = ctxt->shadow_sys_regs;
> + ctxt->hw_sp_el1 = ctxt->el2_regs[SP_EL2];
> + } else {
> + ctxt->hw_pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
> + ctxt->hw_sys_regs = ctxt->sys_regs;
> + ctxt->hw_sp_el1 = ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1;
> + }
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -38,9 +53,14 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> void kvm_arm_restore_shadow_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
> -
> - *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = ctxt->hw_pstate;
> - ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1 = ctxt->hw_sp_el1;
> + if (unlikely(vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu))) {
> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= PSR_MODE_MASK;
> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) |= ctxt->hw_pstate & ~PSR_MODE_MASK;
> + ctxt->el2_regs[SP_EL2] = ctxt->hw_sp_el1;
> + } else {
> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = ctxt->hw_pstate;
> + ctxt->gp_regs.sp_el1 = ctxt->hw_sp_el1;
> + }
> }
>
> void kvm_arm_init_cpu_context(kvm_cpu_context_t *cpu_ctxt)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC 08/55] KVM: arm64: Set virtual EL2 context depending on the guest exception level Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com> - 2017-06-01 22:30 +0200 Re: [RFC 08/55] KVM: arm64: Set virtual EL2 context depending on the guest exception level Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-06-02 10:50 +0200
csiph-web