Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1655630

Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store

From Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store
Date 2017-06-01 19:50 +0200
Message-ID <tNCop-5EC-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tN934-3sV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNfLb-7R6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNmMG-4cv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tNAZk-4Q6-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 06/01/2017 11:11 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 09:05:07 +0800
> Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> wrote:
> 
>> I admit my patches are not well tested, and they may not well fix the bugs.
>> I am looking forward to opinions and suggestions :)
> 
> May I politely suggest that sending out untested locking changes is a
> dangerous thing to do?  You really should not be changing the locking in a
> piece of kernel code without understanding very well what the lock is
> protecting and being able to say why your changes are safe.  Without that,
> the risk of introducing subtle bugs is very high.
> 
> It looks like you have written a useful tool that could help us to make
> the kernel more robust.  If you are interested in my suggestion, I would
> recommend that you post the sleep-in-atomic scenarios that you are
> finding, but refrain from "fixing" them in any case where you cannot offer
> a strong explanation of why your fix is correct.
> 
> Thanks for working to find bugs in the kernel!

I agree with the suggestion above. Locking changes should only be done in 
conjunction with testing by someone that actually has the hardware.

Larry

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> - 2017-05-31 12:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in  b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Michael Büsch <m@bues.ch> - 2017-05-31 17:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in  b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> - 2017-05-31 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> - 2017-06-01 03:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-06-01 06:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in  b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2017-06-01 18:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in  b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> - 2017-06-01 19:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in b43legacy_attr_interfmode_store Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@163.com> - 2017-06-02 03:20 +0200

csiph-web