Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1653854
| From | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix |
| Date | 2017-05-31 08:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tN597-16T-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tN597-16T-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN597-16T-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN597-16T-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tN597-16T-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:06 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 31 May 2017 at 08:10, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>> From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>>> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 22:15:42 +0200
>>>
>>>> If the e1000e maintainer wants to coalesce or not return statements
>>>> this simple way, that's imo on him to change the color as needed.
>>>
>>> That's not how things work.
>>>
>>> If the maintainer wants you to style things a certain way, either you
>>> do it that way or your patch isn't accepted.
>
> Consider this pull a regression report, pls handle it.
And I guess I pile of more cc, to make this regression report
complete. I mean you got the backtrace, bisect and a proposed fix, and
the almost-whitespace change demanded is something gcc does in its
sleep. I'd understand a request to retest if it would be a real
functional change, but in this situation I have no idea why this
regression just can't be fixed already.
Not sure if it's really preferred if regression reports come
incomplete, without bugfix and bisect attached.
-Daniel
>> I'm not really sure why Chris just couldn't respin already.
>>
>> Though really I think Chris should have just asked for a revert of the
>> original patch that broke stuff, instead of trying to patch a driver
>> if he doesn't have time to get the patch right for the maintainer.
>
> Ok, can we pls revert 2800209994f8 ("e1000e: Refactor PM flows") then?
>
> Thanks, Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-31 08:20 +0200
Re: [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-05-31 17:10 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/1] e1000e: Undo e1000e_pm_freeze if __e1000_shutdown fails Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] e1000e: Undo e1000e_pm_freeze if __e1000_shutdown fails David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-06-02 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] e1000e: Undo e1000e_pm_freeze if __e1000_shutdown fails Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> - 2017-06-06 22:50 +0200
RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] e1000e: Undo e1000e_pm_freeze if __e1000_shutdown fails "Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@intel.com> - 2017-06-07 03:10 +0200
Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2 1/1] e1000e: Undo e1000e_pm_freeze if __e1000_shutdown fails "Neftin, Sasha" <sasha.neftin@intel.com> - 2017-06-05 07:30 +0200
Re: [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 17:50 +0200
Re: [PULL] topic/e1000e-fix Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-31 18:30 +0200
csiph-web