Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1653573
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 1/3] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation |
| Date | 2017-05-30 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tMXbz-4e6-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tMXbz-4e6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Many subsystems will not use refcount_t unless there is a way to build the
kernel so that there is no regression in speed compared to atomic_t. This
adds CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL to enable the full refcount_t implementation
which has the validation but is slightly slower. When not enabled,
refcount_t uses the basic unchecked atomic_t routines, which results in
no code changes compared to just using atomic_t directly.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
arch/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++
include/linux/refcount.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
lib/refcount.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
index 6c00e5b00f8b..fba3bf186728 100644
--- a/arch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/Kconfig
@@ -867,4 +867,13 @@ config STRICT_MODULE_RWX
config ARCH_WANT_RELAX_ORDER
bool
+config REFCOUNT_FULL
+ bool "Perform full reference count validation at the expense of speed"
+ help
+ Enabling this switches the refcounting infrastructure from a fast
+ unchecked atomic_t implementation to a fully state checked
+ implementation, which can be slower but provides protections
+ against various use-after-free conditions that can be used in
+ security flaw exploits.
+
source "kernel/gcov/Kconfig"
diff --git a/include/linux/refcount.h b/include/linux/refcount.h
index b34aa649d204..68ecb431dbab 100644
--- a/include/linux/refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/refcount.h
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static inline unsigned int refcount_read(const refcount_t *r)
return atomic_read(&r->refs);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL
extern __must_check bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
extern void refcount_add(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
@@ -52,6 +53,49 @@ extern void refcount_sub(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r);
extern void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r);
+#else
+static inline __must_check bool refcount_add_not_zero(unsigned int i,
+ refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return atomic_add_return(i, &r->refs) != 0;
+}
+
+static inline void refcount_add(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
+{
+ atomic_add(i, &r->refs);
+}
+
+static inline __must_check bool refcount_inc_not_zero(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return atomic_add_unless(&r->refs, 1, 0);
+}
+
+static inline void refcount_inc(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ atomic_inc(&r->refs);
+}
+
+static inline __must_check bool refcount_sub_and_test(unsigned int i,
+ refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return atomic_sub_return(i, &r->refs) == 0;
+}
+
+static inline void refcount_sub(unsigned int i, refcount_t *r)
+{
+ atomic_sub(i, &r->refs);
+}
+
+static inline __must_check bool refcount_dec_and_test(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ return atomic_dec_return(&r->refs) == 0;
+}
+
+static inline void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
+{
+ atomic_dec(&r->refs);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL */
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_if_one(refcount_t *r);
extern __must_check bool refcount_dec_not_one(refcount_t *r);
diff --git a/lib/refcount.c b/lib/refcount.c
index 9f906783987e..5d0582a9480c 100644
--- a/lib/refcount.c
+++ b/lib/refcount.c
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
#include <linux/refcount.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL
+
/**
* refcount_add_not_zero - add a value to a refcount unless it is 0
* @i: the value to add to the refcount
@@ -225,6 +227,7 @@ void refcount_dec(refcount_t *r)
WARN_ONCE(refcount_dec_and_test(r), "refcount_t: decrement hit 0; leaking memory.\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(refcount_dec);
+#endif /* CONFIG_REFCOUNT_FULL */
/**
* refcount_dec_if_one - decrement a refcount if it is 1
--
2.7.4
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 1/3] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-05-30 23:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v5 1/3] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@intel.com> - 2017-05-31 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-31 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] refcount: Create unchecked atomic_t implementation Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-06-01 16:50 +0200
csiph-web