Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1653304

Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present

From Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present
Date 2017-05-30 17:20 +0200
Message-ID <tMR69-A4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tISNb-4Fr-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 19/05/2017 18:14, Roman Penyaev wrote:
> 
> 1. Simple one, KVM SVM side, which makes sure that CPL is not updated
>    if segment is unusable:
> 
>    --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>    +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
>    @@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ static void svm_set_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>             * forces SS.DPL to 3 on sysret, so we ignore that case; fixing it
>             * would entail passing the CPL to userspace and back.
>             */
>    -       if (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS)
>    +       if (seg == VCPU_SREG_SS && !var->unusable)
>                    svm->vmcb->save.cpl = (s->attrib >>
> SVM_SELECTOR_DPL_SHIFT) & 3;

Based on the discussion between you and Andy, my understanding is that
it would not be enough to ensure that the attributes are preserved
across a roundtrip through KVM_GET_SEGMENT and KVM_SET_SEGMENT.  We need
a workaround in the hypervisor if we don't want to pass the CPL to
userspace and back.

Maybe if 1) in 64-bit mode 2) SS.P=0 3) SS selector != 0, then the CPL
can be taken from SS.RPL?

Thanks,

Paolo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-05-30 17:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present Roman Penyaev <roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com> - 2017-05-30 18:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-05-30 18:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: do not drop VMCB CPL to 0 if SS is not present Gi-Oh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com> - 2017-05-30 18:40 +0200

csiph-web