Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1652066

Re: [PATCH v2 22/27] thunderbolt: Add support for DMA configuration based mailbox

From Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 22/27] thunderbolt: Add support for DMA configuration based mailbox
Date 2017-05-28 11:20 +0200
Message-ID <tM2wG-8pZ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tLq81-87A-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLq84-87A-73@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLMrT-6fP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 07:08:34PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > The DMA (NHI) port of a switch provides access to the NVM of the host
> > controller (and devices starting from Intel Alpine Ridge). The NVM
> > contains also more complete DROM for the root switch including vendor
> > and device identification strings.
> 
> > +               ret = dma_port_flash_read_block(dma, address, dma->buf,
> > +                                               ALIGN(nbytes, 4));
> > +               if (ret) {
> > +                       if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> > +                               if (retries--)
> > +                                       continue;
> > +                               ret = -EIO;
> > +                       }
> > +                       return ret;
> > +               }
> > +
> > +               memcpy(buf, dma->buf + offset, nbytes);
> 
> > +       do {
> > +               u32 nbytes = min_t(u32, size, MAIL_DATA_DWORDS * 4);
> > +               int ret;
> > +
> > +               memcpy(dma->buf + offset, buf, nbytes);
> > +
> > +               ret = dma_port_flash_write_block(dma, address, buf, nbytes);
> > +               if (ret) {
> > +                       if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> > +                               if (retries--)
> > +                                       continue;
> > +                               ret = -EIO;
> > +                       }
> > +                       return ret;
> > +               }
> 
> Just to be sure I didn't miss anything.
> Can't we just map buffer into DMA capable address space instead of memcpy()'ing?

The buffer is there to handle unaligned (non-dword) reads and writes. I
suppose you could do that but it adds more complexity than it is worth
IMHO because this is about sending and receiving messages over low-speed
control channel.

If there is a need to optimize things like this, I think we can do that
later on.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 22/27] thunderbolt: Add support for DMA configuration based mailbox Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-26 18:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 22/27] thunderbolt: Add support for DMA configuration  based mailbox Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 22/27] thunderbolt: Add support for DMA configuration  based mailbox Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-28 11:20 +0200

csiph-web