Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1651513
| From | "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface |
| Date | 2017-05-26 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLqrn-8e2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <tL0ZY-iP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL0ZY-iP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL1jk-pv-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL1jk-pv-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLqrn-8e2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 05/26/2017 11:13 AM, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > 25.05.2017, 16:50, "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>: > >>> Why do you have to create a pseudo-platform device driver to connect w1 and power/supply? >>> >>> I'm not against creating w1 drivers in different places than drivers/w1, but so far >>> it was only power drivers which have problem with it (and they easily work it out), >>> and this rises a flag. >> >> We could keep it in w1 if we really wanted, but then things like Kconfig >> will get difficult to manage (we will jump between menus and have odd >> dependencies). > > One still has to jump between kconfig menus to enable w1 and power devices, > or to use 'select', nothing really changes. > Well, one less step in that we get to drop the platform shim driver, but I see what you mean. >> The other w1/slaves seem to mostly be simple EEPROMs and Gauges that >> would otherwise end up in misc/ so it is fine if they live in w1, but >> BQ27xxx does have a proper home in power/supplies and its i2c interface >> is already there, so moving the w1 interface there also makes sense to me. >> >>> I would rather move w1 header into include/linux, will it be enough? >> >> That's what this patch does, we just also re-organize things a bit so >> only things that need to be public end up in include/linux. It seems to >> be all that is needed for my use-case at least. > > Ok, lets merge it. Great, thanks! > > My personal note: please drop TI copyright from headers, at least from those which already exist > and you move them around, it is your work and not TI. It is up to you to put into driver itself. > 9-5 TI owns everything I touch :) so I just figured I should add it, but I have no personal problem dropping the copyright notice (actually I already did this as you requested this in v1).
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-05-25 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2017-05-25 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2017-05-25 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2017-05-25 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] w1: Add subsystem kernel public interface "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2017-05-26 18:40 +0200
csiph-web