Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1651390

Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local TLB flushes

From Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local TLB flushes
Date 2017-05-26 15:30 +0200
Message-ID <tLntv-6pE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tLbC1-79q-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLbC2-79q-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLcop-7Hu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLcRr-87p-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Red Hat, Inc

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 19:01 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-05-25 at 17:47 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > 
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > > @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ void flush_tlb_mm_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > > unsigned long start,
> > >               goto out;
> > >       }
> > > 
> > > -     if (!current->mm) {
> > > +     if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.state) != TLBSTATE_OK) {
> > >               leave_mm(smp_processor_id());
> > 
> > Unless -mm changed leave_mm (I did not check), this
> > is not quite correct yet.
> > 
> > The reason is leave_mm (at least in the latest Linus
> > tree) ignores the cpu argument for one of its checks.
> > 
> > You should probably fix that in an earlier patch,
> > assuming you haven't already done so in -mm.
> > 
> > void leave_mm(int cpu)
> > {
> >         struct mm_struct *active_mm =
> > this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.active_mm);
> >         if (this_cpu_read(cpu_tlbstate.state) == TLBSTATE_OK)
> >                 BUG();
> >         if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(active_mm))) {
> >                 cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(active_mm));
> >                 load_cr3(swapper_pg_dir);
> 
> I agree it's odd, but what's the bug?  Both before and after,
> leave_mm
> needed to be called with cpu == smp_processor_id(), and
> smp_processor_id() warns if it's called in a preemptible context.

Indeed, you are right. Looking at too much code at once...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v3 0/8] x86 TLB flush cleanups, moving toward PCID support Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH v3 6/8] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB to track the actual loaded mm Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local TLB flushes Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for  local TLB flushes Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-26 03:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local  TLB flushes Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 04:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for  local TLB flushes Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-05-26 15:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] x86/mm: Change the leave_mm() condition for local  TLB flushes Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> - 2017-05-26 03:50 +0200
  [PATCH v3 5/8] x86/mm: Remove the UP tlbflush code; always use the formerly SMP code Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH v3 1/8] x86/mm: Pass flush_tlb_info to flush_tlb_others() etc Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 02:50 +0200
  [PATCH v3 4/8] x86/mm: Use new merged flush logic in arch_tlbbatch_flush() Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 02:50 +0200

csiph-web