Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1652013

Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head

From Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head
Date 2017-05-28 02:40 +0200
Message-ID <tLUpr-2Tm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tLHVg-2Df-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tLSxj-1HD-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > But currently, LSM_HOOK_INIT() macro depends on the address of
> > security_hook_heads being known at compile time. If we use an enum
> > so that LSM_HOOK_INIT() macro does not need to know absolute address of
> > security_hook_heads, it will help us to use that allocator for LSM hooks.
> >
> > As a result of introducing an enum, security_hook_heads becomes a local
> > variable, making it easier to allocate security_hook_heads at run time.
> 
> You loose the type checking in security.c. This is the same
> objection I had before to this approach. It's why I objected
> to 3dfc9b02864b19f4 and why I didn't adopt the array approach
> in the first place. If it's so important that randstruct not
> complain about the unnatural cast, revert the patch that
> introduced it. I see no net benefit in hiding the symbol over
> loosing the typing. You trade a list of typed function
> pointers for an enumerated list of values. It doesn't even
> make the code look smaller!

I still cannot understand what you are referring by "type checking".
Please explain me what the type checking in security/security.c is.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-27 13:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-05-28 00:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-28 02:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-05-28 03:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-28 03:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-05-28 20:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-05-30 12:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-30 16:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2017-05-30 17:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-05-31 01:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-31 12:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-05-31 13:10 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-31 13:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2017-05-31 16:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-31 17:20 +0200
                Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2017-05-31 17:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of  struct list_head José Bollo <jobol@nonadev.net> - 2017-05-31 12:00 +0200
  [PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-28 22:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array  of struct list_head Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-05-28 23:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array  of struct list_head Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - 2017-05-29 19:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array  of struct list_head James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-05-30 12:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array  of struct list_head Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com> - 2017-05-31 23:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array  of struct list_head James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2017-06-01 01:00 +0200

csiph-web