Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1651947

Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor

From Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor
Date 2017-05-27 19:50 +0200
Message-ID <tLO0G-77h-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tKDh0-2cD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKDh1-2cD-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
> Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>
> Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam <v-srm@microsoft.com>

> +       u32 max_vp_index;
> +       u32 max_lp_index;

> +       pr_info("Hyper-V: max %d virtual processors, %d logical processors\n",
> +               ms_hyperv.max_vp_index, ms_hyperv.max_lp_index);

And surprisingly no-one from the above list did not get a warning?!

%u, please.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of  virtual/logical processor Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 19:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of  virtual/logical processor Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-05 17:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of  virtual/logical processor Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-06-05 17:40 +0200

csiph-web