Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1651947
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor |
| Date | 2017-05-27 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tLO0G-77h-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tKDh0-2cD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKDh1-2cD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
> Max virtual processor will be needed for 'extended' hypercalls supporting
> more than 64 vCPUs. While on it, unify on 'Hyper-V' in mshyperv.c as we
> currently have a mix, report acquired misc features as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
> Tested-by: Simon Xiao <sixiao@microsoft.com>
> Tested-by: Srikanth Myakam <v-srm@microsoft.com>
> + u32 max_vp_index;
> + u32 max_lp_index;
> + pr_info("Hyper-V: max %d virtual processors, %d logical processors\n",
> + ms_hyperv.max_vp_index, ms_hyperv.max_lp_index);
And surprisingly no-one from the above list did not get a warning?!
%u, please.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-05-27 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-06-05 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/10] x86/hyper-v: stash the max number of virtual/logical processor Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-06-05 17:40 +0200
csiph-web