Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1650797

Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence : (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible)

From Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence : (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible)
Date 2017-05-25 22:20 +0200
Message-ID <tL7oJ-4nj-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <tIRHs-3XA-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIUvE-5Pe-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIUvE-5Pe-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL4qS-2vP-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tL4TT-2Ht-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi!

> > > So that yields:
> > > 
> > >  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> > >  * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> > >  * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or at your option) any
> > >  * later version; or, when distributed separately from the Linux kernel or
> > >  * incorporated into other software packages, subject to the
> > 
> > You have more )s there than (s.
> 
> Thanks just removed that pesky )
> 
> > Can you get rid of the "when distributed separately from the Linux
> > kernel or incorporated into other software packages," wording? I'm not
> > exactly sure what it is trying to say, and if it limits the license
> > below in any way.
> 
> I had to pick an "or language" used already upstream and which folks were OK
> with, this was one and I went with it. I prefer it as it makes it clear the
> intent is outside of Linux I wish copyleft-next to apply.

Yes, the intent is clear. What is not clear is if the intent is
legally binding.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence :  (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-05-25 19:10 +0200
  Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence :  (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible) "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-05-25 19:40 +0200
    Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence :  (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-05-25 22:20 +0200
      Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence :  (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible) "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org> - 2017-05-26 01:00 +0200

csiph-web