Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1649163
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/core] 1c3c5eab17: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible |
| Date | 2017-05-24 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKyr0-7d2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tKx1U-6lD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:25:45PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> [ 15.697784] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
> [ 15.698793] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x1e
> [ 15.699461] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc2-00108-g1c3c5ea #1
> [ 15.700431] Call Trace:
> [ 15.700530] dump_stack+0x110/0x192
> [ 15.700530] check_preemption_disabled+0x10c/0x128
> [ 15.700530] ? set_debug_rodata+0x25/0x25
> [ 15.700530] debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x1e
> [ 15.700530] sched_clock_init_late+0x27/0x87
> [ 15.700530] ? sched_init+0x4c6/0x4c6
> [ 15.700530] do_one_initcall+0xa3/0x1a7
> [ 15.700530] ? set_debug_rodata+0x25/0x25
> [ 15.700530] kernel_init_freeable+0x25e/0x304
> [ 15.700530] ? rest_init+0x29a/0x29a
> [ 15.700530] kernel_init+0x14/0x147
> [ 15.700530] ? rest_init+0x29a/0x29a
> [ 15.700530] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
> [ 15.707460] sched_clock: Marking stable (15707446101, 0)->(16254936915, -547490814)
This should fix I think...
---
Subject: sched/clock: Fix early boot preempt warning
The more strict early boot preemption warnings found that
__set_sched_clock_stable() was incorrectly assuming we'd still be
running on a single CPU.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/clock.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/clock.c b/kernel/sched/clock.c
index 1a0d389d2f2b..ca0f8fc945c6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/clock.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/clock.c
@@ -133,12 +133,19 @@ static void __scd_stamp(struct sched_clock_data *scd)
static void __set_sched_clock_stable(void)
{
- struct sched_clock_data *scd = this_scd();
+ struct sched_clock_data *scd;
/*
+ * Since we're still unstable and the tick is already running, we have
+ * to disable IRQs in order to get a consistent scd->tick* reading.
+ */
+ local_irq_disable();
+ scd = this_scd();
+ /*
* Attempt to make the (initial) unstable->stable transition continuous.
*/
__sched_clock_offset = (scd->tick_gtod + __gtod_offset) - (scd->tick_raw);
+ local_irq_enable();
printk(KERN_INFO "sched_clock: Marking stable (%lld, %lld)->(%lld, %lld)\n",
scd->tick_gtod, __gtod_offset,
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/core] 1c3c5eab17: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-24 09:00 +0200 Re: [lkp-robot] [sched/core] 1c3c5eab17: BUG:using_smp_processor_id()in_preemptible Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-05-24 10:10 +0200 [tip:sched/core] sched/clock: Fix early boot preempt assumption in __set_sched_clock_stable() tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-05-24 12:30 +0200
csiph-web