Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1648083
| From | Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 01/20] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document vendor to be used and deprecated ones |
| Date | 2017-05-23 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKivU-3WY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tJWc1-6Hl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tJWc2-6Hl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKime-3Tp-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Rob, On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas > <javier@dowhile0.org> wrote: >> The at24 driver allows to register I2C EEPROM chips using different vendor >> and devices, but the I2C subsystem does not take the vendor into account >> when matching using the I2C table since it only has device entries. >> >> But when matching using an OF table, both the vendor and device has to be >> taken into account, so the exact list of supported <vendor,device> tuples >> should be documented in the Device Tree binding document. >> >> But there is no need to have different manufacturers if the EEPROM chips >> from different manufacturers are really compatible, so matching using a >> single "atmel" vendor is enough for all chip types. >> >> Document in the Device Tree binding that the "atmel" manufacturer should >> be used, and also document the manufacturers that have been deprecated. >> >> Suggested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> >> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> >> >> --- >> >> Changes in v4: >> - Document the manufacturers that have been deprecated (Rob Herring). > > I don't think that's what I said. > >> >> Changes in v3: None >> Changes in v2: None >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt | 14 ++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt >> index 5696eb508e95..121499252179 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt >> @@ -2,22 +2,16 @@ EEPROMs (I2C) >> >> Required properties: >> >> - - compatible : should be "<manufacturer>,<type>", like these: >> + - compatible : should be "atmel,<type>", like these: >> >> "atmel,24c00", "atmel,24c01", "atmel,24c02", "atmel,24c04", >> "atmel,24c08", "atmel,24c16", "atmel,24c32", "atmel,24c64", >> "atmel,24c128", "atmel,24c256", "atmel,24c512", "atmel,24c1024" >> >> - "catalyst,24c32" >> + The following manufacturers values have been deprecated: >> + "at", "at24", "catalyst", "microchip", "nxp", "ramtron", "renesas", "st" > > Only at and at24 should be deprecated. > Yes, I also fixed that on v5. Could you please take a look to that version instead? Best regards, Javier
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 01/20] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document vendor to be used and deprecated ones Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> - 2017-05-22 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/20] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document vendor to be used and deprecated ones Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2017-05-23 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/20] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: Document vendor to be used and deprecated ones Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> - 2017-05-23 16:00 +0200
csiph-web