Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1648109

Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix)

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix)
Date 2017-05-23 16:20 +0200
Message-ID <tKiPg-4kM-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tIVUJ-6R6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tJU0y-5aj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tJXhM-7lx-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKeLE-1oL-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:34 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, asking people to spread out across releases would remove
>> dependencies a lot, but it would also slow down progress and frustrate
>> a lot of contributors so we don't do that.
>
> The above works fine for new support, or for new platforms.
>
> There's still support being migrated from platform code to DT, which
> requires three steps:
>   1. New DT-aware driver support,
>   2. DT update to use the new driver support,
>   3. Clean up platform code after optional DTB backwards compatibility
>      grace period,
> To make matters worse, 1 may conflict with the existing platform code,
> and 2 must sometimes not be done before 1. Hence you may need three kernel
> releases.
> So we're already planning now what to clean up for v4.15 ;-)
>
> Would it be acceptable to do step 2 in the same release, after the driver
> support has entered in -rc1? I know this is more than just replacing
> numbers by symbolic values.

I'd say it really depends on the individual case. Do you have a particular
platform in mind? E.g. For some of the more obsolete platforms that
Linus Walleij has worked on over time, we have sometimes relaxed the
rules about clean bisection and just merged everything in parallel, knowing
that nobody else was likely to run that code on a vanilla kernel anyway.

       Arnd

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix) Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2017-05-19 21:40 +0200
  Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix) Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-22 13:50 +0200
    Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix) Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2017-05-22 17:20 +0200
      Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch  dt-include fix) Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-23 10:30 +0200
      Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix) Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-05-23 12:00 +0200
        Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-05-23 16:20 +0200
        Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: SoC fixes (and a cross-arch dt-include fix) Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2017-05-23 18:50 +0200

csiph-web