Re: [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: virtualize the policy/ directory

From	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: virtualize the policy/ directory
Date	2017-05-24 22:20 +0200
Message-ID	<tKKVd-6Ww-57@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tFMkV-tO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tFMkW-tO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKKit-6rO-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Canonical

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/24/2017 12:38 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 7:46 PM, John Johansen
> <john.johansen@canonical.com> wrote:
>> virtualize the apparmor policy/ directory so that the current namespace
>> affects what part of policy is seen. This is done by
>>
>>  * creating a new apparmorfs filesystem
>>  * creating a magic symlink from securityfs to the correct apparmorfs
>>    file in the tree (similar to nsfs use).
>>
>> apparmor fs data and fns also get renamed some to help indicate where
>> they are used
>>
>>   aafs - special magic apparmorfs
>>   aa_sfs - for fns/data that go into securityfs
>>   aa_fs - for fns/data that may be used in the either of aafs or securityfs
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold@canonical.com>
> 
> This all looks fine to me. If you do a v2 of these patches, it might
> make sense to split up some of the logical changes here. For example,
> have one patch that does the renamings but no code changes. Then add
> the new fs, and finally integrate the new fs. That might make it
> easier to review. Regardless:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> 
Okay, thanks will do.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: virtualize the policy/ directory Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-05-24 21:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 3/3] apparmor: virtualize the policy/ directory John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> - 2017-05-24 22:20 +0200

csiph-web