Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1649651
| From | Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 14/24] thunderbolt: Let the connection manager handle all notifications |
| Date | 2017-05-24 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKF98-3ma-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tIuKR-3YK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIuUz-44c-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:39:04PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> @@ -320,18 +330,42 @@ static void tb_ctl_rx_callback(struct tb_ring *ring, struct ring_frame *frame,
> }
>
> frame->size -= 4; /* remove checksum */
> - if (*(__be32 *) (pkg->buffer + frame->size)
> - != tb_crc(pkg->buffer, frame->size)) {
> - tb_ctl_err(pkg->ctl,
> - "RX: checksum mismatch, dropping packet\n");
> - goto rx;
> - }
> + crc32 = tb_crc(pkg->buffer, frame->size);
> be32_to_cpu_array(pkg->buffer, pkg->buffer, frame->size / 4);
>
> - if (frame->eof == TB_CFG_PKG_EVENT) {
> - tb_ctl_handle_plug_event(pkg->ctl, pkg);
> + switch (frame->eof) {
> + case TB_CFG_PKG_READ:
> + case TB_CFG_PKG_WRITE:
> + case TB_CFG_PKG_ERROR:
> + case TB_CFG_PKG_OVERRIDE:
> + case TB_CFG_PKG_RESET:
> + if (*(__be32 *)(pkg->buffer + frame->size) != crc32) {
> + tb_ctl_err(pkg->ctl,
> + "RX: checksum mismatch, dropping packet\n");
> + goto rx;
> + }
Any harm keeping the crc32 check above the switch/case statement?
(And thus also execute it for unknown packets?)
> + case TB_CFG_PKG_EVENT:
> + if (*(__be32 *)(pkg->buffer + frame->size) != crc32) {
> + tb_ctl_err(pkg->ctl,
> + "RX: checksum mismatch, dropping packet\n");
> + goto rx;
> + }
> + tb_ctl_handle_event(pkg->ctl, frame->eof, pkg, frame->size);
> + goto rx;
> +
> + default:
> + tb_ctl_dbg(pkg->ctl, "RX: unknown package %#x, dropping\n",
The packet / package terminology is a bit inconsistent here.
Andreas originally used package. What's the term used by the TB spec?
Thanks,
Lukas
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 14/24] thunderbolt: Let the connection manager handle all notifications Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-18 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 14/24] thunderbolt: Let the connection manager handle all notifications Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> - 2017-05-24 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 14/24] thunderbolt: Let the connection manager handle all notifications Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-25 09:10 +0200
csiph-web