Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1649468
| From | Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix multiple ctrl removal scheduling |
| Date | 2017-05-24 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKCkV-1Ap-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tKqjM-1dD-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tKAVQ-wS-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:37:55AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 01:15:47AM +0300, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > > Commit c5f6ce97c1210 tries to address multiple resets but fails as > > work_busy doesn't involve any synchronization and can fail. This is > > reproducible easily as can be seen by WARNING below which is triggered > > with line: > > > > WARN_ON(dev->ctrl.state == NVME_CTRL_RESETTING) > > > > Allowing multiple resets can result in multiple controller removal as > > well if different conditions inside nvme_reset_work fail and which > > might deadlock on device_release_driver. > > > > This patch addresses the problem by using state of controller to > > decide whether reset should be queued or not as state change is > > synchronizated using controller spinlock. > > But we don't hold the lock over the check and the decision. I suspect Thanks, right. > what we need to do is to actually change to the resetting state > before queueing up the reset work. Can you give that a spin? Sure, will post it in next version.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix multiple ctrl removal scheduling Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com> - 2017-05-24 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix multiple ctrl removal scheduling Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2017-05-24 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: fix multiple ctrl removal scheduling Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com> - 2017-05-24 13:10 +0200
csiph-web