Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1647444
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form |
| Date | 2017-05-23 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tK3ZT-34F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tK3dw-2wK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tK3nb-2zS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:43:18 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 00:38 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > There are valid reasons for > > > > malloc(sizeof(struct S)) > > > > form: > > > > * struct S acts as an anchor for ctags quickly reminding which type is > > in focus > > > > * argument re changing name prevents bugs is semi bogus: > > such changes are rare, > > "void *" cast gives both forms equal opportunity to be screwed up > > > > * proper way to fix those rare misallocation bugs (which indeed happened) > > is type safe allocation macros (see tmalloc from Samba). > > > > However amount of disruption will be so high so it may never be done. > > > > * ratio of allocation styles is ~6400:12000 which is about 1:2 > > so the amount of churn to maintain this rule is pretty high in theory. > > > > The winning move is to not play and not encourage people send trivial stuff. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> > > --- > > > > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 10 ---------- > > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) > > > > --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst > > @@ -808,16 +808,6 @@ kmalloc(), kzalloc(), kmalloc_array(), kcalloc(), vmalloc(), and > > vzalloc(). Please refer to the API documentation for further information > > about them. > > > > -The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following: > > - > > -.. code-block:: c > > - > > - p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...); > > - > > -The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability and > > -introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is changed > > -but the corresponding sizeof that is passed to a memory allocator is not. > > - > > Casting the return value which is a void pointer is redundant. The conversion > > from void pointer to any other pointer type is guaranteed by the C programming > > language. > > Thanks. I agree with this deletion. I don't. Every damn time I see a p = kmalloc(sizeof struct foo) I have to hunt around to check the type of p. And I review a lot of code!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-22 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-23 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-23 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 12:20 +0200
[PATCH] checkpatch: Remove preference for alloc(sizeof(*p), ...) Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-23 00:00 +0200
csiph-web