Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1647444

Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form

From Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred allocation form
Date 2017-05-23 00:30 +0200
Message-ID <tK3ZT-34F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tK3dw-2wK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tK3nb-2zS-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:43:18 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 00:38 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > There are valid reasons for
> > 
> > 	malloc(sizeof(struct S))
> > 
> > form:
> > 
> > * struct S acts as an anchor for ctags quickly reminding which type is
> >   in focus
> > 
> > * argument re changing name prevents bugs is semi bogus:
> >   such changes are rare,
> >   "void *" cast gives both forms equal opportunity to be screwed up
> > 
> > * proper way to fix those rare misallocation bugs (which indeed happened)
> >   is type safe allocation macros (see tmalloc from Samba).
> > 
> >   However amount of disruption will be so high so it may never be done.
> > 
> > * ratio of allocation styles is ~6400:12000 which is about 1:2
> >   so the amount of churn to maintain this rule is pretty high in theory.
> > 
> > The winning move is to not play and not encourage people send trivial stuff.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  Documentation/process/coding-style.rst |   10 ----------
> >  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> > @@ -808,16 +808,6 @@ kmalloc(), kzalloc(), kmalloc_array(), kcalloc(), vmalloc(), and
> >  vzalloc().  Please refer to the API documentation for further information
> >  about them.
> >  
> > -The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following:
> > -
> > -.. code-block:: c
> > -
> > -	p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...);
> > -
> > -The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability and
> > -introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is changed
> > -but the corresponding sizeof that is passed to a memory allocator is not.
> > -
> >  Casting the return value which is a void pointer is redundant. The conversion
> >  from void pointer to any other pointer type is guaranteed by the C programming
> >  language.
> 
> Thanks.  I agree with this deletion.

I don't.  Every damn time I see a p = kmalloc(sizeof struct foo) I have
to hunt around to check the type of p.  And I review a lot of code!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred  allocation form Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 23:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred  allocation form Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 23:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as  preferred allocation form Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-22 23:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as  preferred allocation form Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-23 00:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as  preferred allocation form Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-23 00:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: delete "kmalloc(sizeof(*var))" as preferred  allocation form Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 12:20 +0200
  [PATCH] checkpatch: Remove preference for alloc(sizeof(*p), ...) Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-23 00:00 +0200

csiph-web