Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1647230
| From | Roman Guschin <guroan@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills |
| Date | 2017-05-22 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tJZWi-z3-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tIR4J-3uF-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIT6y-4LV-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tJRFn-3IZ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2017-05-22 10:11 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>: > > > On 19.05.2017 19:34, Roman Guschin wrote: >> >> 2017-05-19 15:22 GMT+01:00 Konstantin Khlebnikov >> <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>: >> From a user's point of view the difference between "oom" and "max" >> becomes really vague here, >> assuming that "max" is described almost in the same words: >> >> "The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was >> about to go over the max boundary. If direct reclaim >> fails to bring it down, the OOM killer is invoked." >> >> I wonder, if it's better to fix the existing "oom" value to show what >> it has to show, according to docs, >> rather than to introduce a new one? >> > > Nope, they are different. I think we should rephase documentation somehow > > low - count of reclaims below low level > high - count of post-allocation reclaims above high level > max - count of direct reclaims > oom - count of failed direct reclaims > oom_kill - count of oom killer invocations and killed processes Definitely worth it. Also, I would prefer to reserve "oom" for number of oom victims, and introduce something like "reclaim_failed". It will be consistent with existing vmstat. Thanks!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2017-05-19 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-05-19 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Roman Guschin <guroan@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2017-05-22 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Roman Guschin <guroan@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2017-05-23 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2017-05-23 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> - 2017-05-24 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-05-23 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru> - 2017-05-23 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill: count global and memory cgroup oom kills Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> - 2017-05-23 13:30 +0200
csiph-web