Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1646858
| From | Fredrik Markström <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Core isolation, cpu hotplug and stop_machine |
| Date | 2017-05-22 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tJVfX-68S-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello,
As I understand it the recommended way to force pending timers of a
core when trying to isolate it (runtime) is to use cpu hotplug. The
current implementation of cpu hotplug has a serious drawback in that
it uses stop_machine() which disturbs already isolated cores. This is
a serious problem in our usecase.
I would guess we are not the only ones with this problem, but as far
as I can see there is currently no solution for this in the latest
next. There was a patchset back in 2013 that implemented
stop_machine-free hotplug, but that was never accepted.
(https://lwn.net/Articles/538819/)
So is there any ongoing work to solve this problem and what is the
preferred way to solve it, is it:
1) stop_machine() free hotplug. It seems to be quite complex but
probably solves more problems
then the one above.
2) Invent some new mechanism/interface separate from hotplug to
migrate timers and hrtimers.
3) Don't, because this isn't a use-case that linux should support.
/Fredrik
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Core isolation, cpu hotplug and stop_machine Fredrik Markström <fredrik.markstrom@gmail.com> - 2017-05-22 15:10 +0200 Re: Core isolation, cpu hotplug and stop_machine Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-05-22 21:10 +0200
csiph-web