Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1646612

Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding

From Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding
Date 2017-05-22 10:50 +0200
Message-ID <tJRcm-3bn-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tJKkx-74C-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:29 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:

> Because "simple-bus" indicates that child nodes are
> simply memory mapped, but the node "register-bit-led"
> can not be memory-mapped.
> So, "simple-mfd" can not be replaced "simple-bus" here.

Yeah... just like Lee points out, you are spot on, this is exactly
the reason why we created "simple-mfd" in the first place
IIRC.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-05-22 03:30 +0200
  Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-05-22 09:50 +0200
  Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-05-22 10:50 +0200
    Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-05-23 03:30 +0200
      Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-05-23 09:10 +0200
        Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2017-05-24 07:00 +0200
          Re: [DT Question] "simple-mfd" DT binding Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-05-24 09:20 +0200

csiph-web