Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1644587

Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused

From Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused
Date 2017-05-18 16:20 +0200
Message-ID <tIurv-3RH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tItF7-37o-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 18-05-17, 15:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Enabling the arche platform for compile testing showed a harmless
> warning with CONFIG_PM=n:
> 
> drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c:632:12: error: 'arche_platform_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c:618:12: error: 'arche_platform_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> 
> This marks the functions as __maybe_unused to shut up the warnings.
> 
> Fixes: 2eccd4aa19fc ("staging: greybus: enable compile testing of arche driver")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
> index 5bce5e039596..eced2d26467b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/arche-platform.c
> @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ static int arche_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int arche_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static __maybe_unused int arche_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * If timing profile premits, we may shutdown bridge
> @@ -629,7 +629,7 @@ static int arche_platform_suspend(struct device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int arche_platform_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static __maybe_unused int arche_platform_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Atleast for ES2 we have to meet the delay requirement between

Is __maybe_unused the more preferred way than putting these routines
under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ifdef ?

-- 
viresh

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-05-18 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> - 2017-05-18 15:40 +0200
  Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as  __maybe_unused Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-05-18 16:20 +0200
    Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-05-18 17:00 +0200
      Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as  __maybe_unused Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-05-19 05:50 +0200
        Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH] staging: greybus: mark PM functions as __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-05-19 09:00 +0200

csiph-web