Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1645752
| From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net-next V5 0/9] vhost_net rx batch dequeuing |
| Date | 2017-05-19 18:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tIT6y-4LV-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tHYBj-6Fi-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIemK-8jO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIJAd-6Ek-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 02:27:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2017年05月18日 04:59, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:14:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > This series tries to implement rx batching for vhost-net. This is done > > > by batching the dequeuing from skb_array which was exported by > > > underlayer socket and pass the sbk back through msg_control to finish > > > userspace copying. This is also the requirement for more batching > > > implemention on rx path. > > > > > > Tests shows at most 7.56% improvment bon rx pps on top of batch > > > zeroing and no obvious changes for TCP_STREAM/TCP_RR result. > > > > > > Please review. > > > > > > Thanks > > A surprisingly large gain for such as simple change. It would be nice > > to understand better why this helps - in particular, does the optimal > > batch size change if ring is bigger or smaller? > > Will test, just want to confirm. You mean virtio ring not tx_queue_len here? > > Thanks Exactly. Thanks, MST
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH net-next V5 0/9] vhost_net rx batch dequeuing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 06:20 +0200
[PATCH net-next V5 7/9] tun: support receiving skb through msg_control Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 06:20 +0200
[PATCH net-next V5 1/9] ptr_ring: add ptr_ring_unconsume Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 06:20 +0200
[PATCH net-next V5 8/9] tap: support receiving skb from msg_control Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 06:20 +0200
[PATCH net-next V5 2/9] skb_array: introduce skb_array_unconsume Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next V5 0/9] vhost_net rx batch dequeuing "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-05-17 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next V5 0/9] vhost_net rx batch dequeuing Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-05-19 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next V5 0/9] vhost_net rx batch dequeuing "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-05-19 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH net-next V5 0/9] vhost_net rx batch dequeuing David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-05-18 16:10 +0200
csiph-web