Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1645576

RE: [PATCH V7] perf/x86: add sysfs entry to freeze counter on SMI

From "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH V7] perf/x86: add sysfs entry to freeze counter on SMI
Date 2017-05-19 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <tIPvY-2eo-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tGkFX-6vb-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi tglx,

Are you OK with patch?

Thanks,
Kan

> 
> From: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@intel.com>
> 
> Currently, the SMIs are visible to all performance counters. Because
> many users want to measure everything including SMIs. But in some
> cases, the SMI cycles should not be count. For example, to calculate
> the cost of SMI itself. So a knob is needed.
> 
> When setting FREEZE_WHILE_SMM bit in IA32_DEBUGCTL, all performance
> counters will be effected. There is no way to do per-counter freeze
> on SMI. So it should not use the per-event interface (e.g. ioctl or
> event attribute) to set FREEZE_WHILE_SMM bit.
> 
> Adds sysfs entry /sys/device/cpu/freeze_on_smi to set FREEZE_WHILE_SMM
> bit in IA32_DEBUGCTL. When set, freezes perfmon and trace messages
> while in SMM.
> Value has to be 0 or 1. It will be applied to all processors.
> Also serialize the entire setting so we don't get multiple concurrent
> threads trying to update to different values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> why do we need an open coded version of __flip_bit() instead of
> reusing that?
>  - msr_set_bit/msr_clear_bit is enough for our requirement.
>    There is no extra work needed.
>    __flip_bit is static inline. It cannot be used directly. If we
>    expose it, there will be two sets of interfaces to flip MSR bit.
>    I think it's too much.
> 
> Changes since V6:
>  - fix sprintf warnning. Sorry for the noise.
> 
> Changes since V5:
>  - Don't force unsigned long to bool. That will be a problem on LE
>    machines.
> 
> Changes since V4:
>  - drop msr_flip_bit function
>  - Use on_each_cpu() which already include all the needed protection
>  - Some small changes according to the comments
> 
>  arch/x86/events/core.c           | 10 +++++++
>  arch/x86/events/intel/core.c     | 63
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/events/perf_event.h     |  3 ++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> index 580b60f..e6f5e4b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
> @@ -1750,6 +1750,8 @@ ssize_t x86_event_sysfs_show(char *page, u64
> config, u64 event)
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static struct attribute_group x86_pmu_attr_group;
> +
>  static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>  {
>  	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirk;
> @@ -1813,6 +1815,14 @@ static int __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
>  			x86_pmu_events_group.attrs = tmp;
>  	}
> 
> +	if (x86_pmu.attrs) {
> +		struct attribute **tmp;
> +
> +		tmp = merge_attr(x86_pmu_attr_group.attrs, x86_pmu.attrs);
> +		if (!WARN_ON(!tmp))
> +			x86_pmu_attr_group.attrs = tmp;
> +	}
> +
>  	pr_info("... version:                %d\n",     x86_pmu.version);
>  	pr_info("... bit width:              %d\n",     x86_pmu.cntval_bits);
>  	pr_info("... generic registers:      %d\n",     x86_pmu.num_counters);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index a6d91d4..da9047e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -3160,6 +3160,19 @@ static int intel_pmu_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
> 
> +static void flip_smm_bit(void *data)
> +{
> +	unsigned long set = *(unsigned long *)data;
> +
> +	if (set > 0) {
> +		msr_set_bit(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR,
> +			    DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM_BIT);
> +	} else {
> +		msr_clear_bit(MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR,
> +			      DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM_BIT);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
>  {
>  	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
> @@ -3174,6 +3187,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
> 
>  	cpuc->lbr_sel = NULL;
> 
> +	flip_smm_bit(&x86_pmu.attr_freeze_on_smi);
> +
>  	if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
>  		return;
> 
> @@ -3595,6 +3610,52 @@ static struct attribute *hsw_events_attrs[] = {
>  	NULL
>  };
> 
> +static ssize_t freeze_on_smi_show(struct device *cdev,
> +				  struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				  char *buf)
> +{
> +	return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n", x86_pmu.attr_freeze_on_smi);
> +}
> +
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(freeze_on_smi_mutex);
> +
> +static ssize_t freeze_on_smi_store(struct device *cdev,
> +				   struct device_attribute *attr,
> +				   const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> +	unsigned long val;
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +
> +	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (val > 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&freeze_on_smi_mutex);
> +
> +	if (x86_pmu.attr_freeze_on_smi == val)
> +		goto done;
> +
> +	x86_pmu.attr_freeze_on_smi = val;
> +
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	on_each_cpu(flip_smm_bit, &val, 1);
> +	put_online_cpus();
> +done:
> +	mutex_unlock(&freeze_on_smi_mutex);
> +
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(freeze_on_smi);
> +
> +static struct attribute *intel_pmu_attrs[] = {
> +	&dev_attr_freeze_on_smi.attr,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
>  __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  {
>  	union cpuid10_edx edx;
> @@ -3641,6 +3702,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
> 
>  	x86_pmu.max_pebs_events		= min_t(unsigned,
> MAX_PEBS_EVENTS, x86_pmu.num_counters);
> 
> +
> +	x86_pmu.attrs			= intel_pmu_attrs;
>  	/*
>  	 * Quirk: v2 perfmon does not report fixed-purpose events, so
>  	 * assume at least 3 events, when not running in a hypervisor:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> index be3d362..53728ee 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
> @@ -562,6 +562,9 @@ struct x86_pmu {
>  	ssize_t		(*events_sysfs_show)(char *page, u64 config);
>  	struct attribute **cpu_events;
> 
> +	unsigned long	attr_freeze_on_smi;
> +	struct attribute **attrs;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * CPU Hotplug hooks
>  	 */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-
> index.h
> index 673f9ac..18b1623 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -137,6 +137,8 @@
>  #define DEBUGCTLMSR_BTS_OFF_OS		(1UL <<  9)
>  #define DEBUGCTLMSR_BTS_OFF_USR		(1UL << 10)
>  #define DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI	(1UL << 11)
> +#define DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM_BIT	14
> +#define DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM	(1UL <<
> DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_IN_SMM_BIT)
> 
>  #define MSR_PEBS_FRONTEND		0x000003f7
> 
> --
> 2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH V7] perf/x86: add sysfs entry to freeze counter on SMI kan.liang@intel.com - 2017-05-12 17:30 +0200
  RE: [PATCH V7] perf/x86: add sysfs entry to freeze counter on SMI "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@intel.com> - 2017-05-19 14:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH V7] perf/x86: add sysfs entry to freeze counter on SMI Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-05-23 09:20 +0200
  [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Add sysfs entry to freeze counters on SMI tip-bot for Kan Liang <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-05-23 10:50 +0200

csiph-web