Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1645566
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified |
| Date | 2017-05-19 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tIPmi-2aO-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tIFPY-3RD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIMoq-8v4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIOTf-1TM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIP2V-22w-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tIPcB-25W-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 08:24:19PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote: > > Ah, I was more thinking of something like PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_SKID or > > something that would skip the test and preserve current behaviour. > > OK, I understand now. For example, for PEBS event, its capabilities should > be set with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_SKID. Except you cannot in fact do that, since PEBS is the same struct pmu as the normal counters (they share counter space after all). Also, weren't there PEBS errata that would allow this to happen? But no, more for other architectures to opt out for some reason. But I'm thinking we want to start out by unconditionally doing this. It would be good to try and Cc most arch pmu maintainers on this though, so they can object.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-19 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-19 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-05-19 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-19 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-19 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-19 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-19 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-19 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-22 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-05-22 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-22 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel: Drop kernel samples even though :u is specified "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-22 14:40 +0200
csiph-web