Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1643118
| From | Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [pwm] question about potential division by zero |
| Date | 2017-05-17 10:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tI2EV-J3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tHSFz-2Gq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 16/05/17 23:56, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> While looking into Coverity ID 1408721 I ran into the following piece of
> code at /drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.c:77:
>
> 77static int mtk_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
> *pwm,
> 78 int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> 79{
> 80 struct mtk_pwm_chip *pc = to_mtk_pwm_chip(chip);
> 81 struct clk *clk = pc->clks[MTK_CLK_PWM1 + pwm->hwpwm];
> 82 u32 resolution, clkdiv = 0;
> 83
> 84 resolution = NSEC_PER_SEC / clk_get_rate(clk);
> 85
> 86 while (period_ns / resolution > 8191) {
> 87 resolution *= 2;
> 88 clkdiv++;
> 89 }
> 90
> 91 if (clkdiv > 7)
> 92 return -EINVAL;
> 93
> 94 mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMCON, BIT(15) | BIT(3) |
> clkdiv);
> 95 mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMDWIDTH, period_ns /
> resolution);
> 96 mtk_pwm_writel(pc, pwm->hwpwm, PWMTHRES, duty_ns / resolution);
> 97
> 98 return 0;
> 99}
>
> The issue here is that in case _clk_ is null, function clk_get_rate() at
> line 84 will return zero and a division by zero will occur.
>
> So my question here is if there is any chance for _clk_ to be null at
> line 81, hence ending up triggering a division by zero at line 84?
No it can't, in the probe function will error out if one of the seven
clocks are not found.
for (i = 0; i < MTK_CLK_MAX; i++) {
pc->clks[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, mtk_pwm_clk_name[i]);
if (IS_ERR(pc->clks[i]))
return PTR_ERR(pc->clks[i]);
}
It registers a pwm chip with five PWMs. When the config function is
called one of the five PWMs is identified (with a value from 0-4) which
correspondents to the MTK_CLK_PWM[1-5], so no bug here neither.
Regards,
Matthias
>
> I'm trying to figure out if this is a false positive or something that
> needs to be fixed.
>
> I'd really appreciate any comment on this.
>
> Thank you
> --
> Gustavo A. R. Silva
>
>
>
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[pwm] question about potential division by zero "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-17 00:00 +0200
Re: [pwm] question about potential division by zero Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2017-05-17 10:40 +0200
Re: [pwm] question about potential division by zero "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-18 00:50 +0200
csiph-web