Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Unbreak HPD handling for r600+

Path	csiph.com!news.freedyn.net!open-news-network.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Unbreak HPD handling for r600+
Date	Mon, 15 May 2017 16:30:03 +0200
Message-ID	<tHpaz-Ra-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tG5QC-4vb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHpaz-Ra-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
Dmarc-Filter	OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com EEC03448D6E
Authentication-Results	ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results	ext-mx05.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lyude@redhat.com
Dkim-Filter	OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com EEC03448D6E
Organization	Red Hat
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Scanned-By	MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
X-Greylist	Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Mon, 15 May 2017 14:19:59 +0000 (UTC)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	131
X-Original-Cc	stable@vger.kernel.org, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Original-Date	Mon, 15 May 2017 10:19:57 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID	<1494857997.14698.1.camel@redhat.com>
X-Original-References	<20170511233112.15962-1-lyude@redhat.com> <70de5a62-1afa-b13b-d0d1-c3415ddbc788@amd.com>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1641748

Show key headers only | View raw

Mind giving me this a poke when this gets pushed upstream btw?

On Fri, 2017-05-12 at 08:56 +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 12.05.2017 um 01:31 schrieb Lyude:
> > We end up reading the interrupt register for HPD5, and then writing
> > it
> > to HPD6 which on systems without anything using HPD5 results in
> > permanently disabling hotplug on one of the display outputs after
> > the
> > first time we acknowledge a hotplug interrupt from the GPU.
> > 
> > This code is really bad. But for now, let's just fix this. I will
> > hopefully have a large patch series to refactor all of this soon.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude <lyude@redhat.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Really nice catch! And yes I agree the copy&pasted code in HPD
> handling 
> always scared me as well.
> 
> Patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>.
> 
> Christian.
> 
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c       | 4 ++--
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c | 4 ++--
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c      | 2 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c        | 4 ++--
> >   4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
> > index 53710dd..cfc917c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/cik.c
> > @@ -7401,7 +7401,7 @@ static inline void cik_irq_ack(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev)
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> >   	if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.cik.disp_int_cont5 &
> > DC_HPD6_INTERRUPT) {
> > -		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   		tmp |= DC_HPDx_INT_ACK;
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> > @@ -7431,7 +7431,7 @@ static inline void cik_irq_ack(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev)
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> >   	if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.cik.disp_int_cont5 &
> > DC_HPD6_RX_INTERRUPT) {
> > -		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   		tmp |= DC_HPDx_RX_INT_ACK;
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
> > index d1b1e0c..c48d19e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c
> > @@ -4933,7 +4933,7 @@ static void evergreen_irq_ack(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev)
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> >   	if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.evergreen.disp_int_cont5 &
> > DC_HPD6_INTERRUPT) {
> > -		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   		tmp |= DC_HPDx_INT_ACK;
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> > @@ -4964,7 +4964,7 @@ static void evergreen_irq_ack(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev)
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> >   	if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.evergreen.disp_int_cont5 &
> > DC_HPD6_RX_INTERRUPT) {
> > -		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   		tmp |= DC_HPDx_RX_INT_ACK;
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > index 0a08517..e06e2d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > @@ -3988,7 +3988,7 @@ static void r600_irq_ack(struct radeon_device
> > *rdev)
> >   			WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   		}
> >   		if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.r600.disp_int_cont2 &
> > DC_HPD6_INTERRUPT) {
> > -			tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +			tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   			tmp |= DC_HPDx_INT_ACK;
> >   			WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   		}
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
> > index 528e5a4..bfeb774 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/si.c
> > @@ -6330,7 +6330,7 @@ static inline void si_irq_ack(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev)
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> >   	if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.evergreen.disp_int_cont5 &
> > DC_HPD6_INTERRUPT) {
> > -		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   		tmp |= DC_HPDx_INT_ACK;
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> > @@ -6361,7 +6361,7 @@ static inline void si_irq_ack(struct
> > radeon_device *rdev)
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> >   	if (rdev->irq.stat_regs.evergreen.disp_int_cont5 &
> > DC_HPD6_RX_INTERRUPT) {
> > -		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD5_INT_CONTROL);
> > +		tmp = RREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL);
> >   		tmp |= DC_HPDx_RX_INT_ACK;
> >   		WREG32(DC_HPD6_INT_CONTROL, tmp);
> >   	}
> 
>

Thread

[PATCH] drm/radeon: Unbreak HPD handling for r600+ Lyude <lyude@redhat.com> - 2017-05-12 01:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Unbreak HPD handling for r600+ Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> - 2017-05-15 16:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: Unbreak HPD handling for r600+ Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> - 2017-05-24 20:40 +0200

csiph-web