Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1641600
| From | Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST |
| Date | 2017-05-15 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHmZ5-82O-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <tHiiJ-4Th-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHkaS-67d-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHkDU-6ia-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHlqi-6SH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHmFH-7ES-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo |
On Mon, 15 May 2017, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 01:29:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 15 May 2017, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote: >> > The intention is to aid readability. Making comments worse so that some >> > retarded script can generate better html or whatnot is just that, >> > retarded. >> > >> > Code matters, generated documentation not so much. I'll take a comment >> > that reads well over one that generates pretty html any day. >> >> The deal is that if you start your comments with "/**" they'll be >> processed with the retarded script to produce pretty html. >> >> For the most part the comments that generate pretty html also read well, >> and we don't expect or want anyone to go overboard with markup. I don't >> think it's unreasonable to make small concessions to improve generated >> documentation for people who care about it even if you don't. > > No. Such a concession has pure negative value. It opens the door to more > patches converting this or that comment to be prettier or whatnot. And > before you know it there's a Markus like idiot spamming you with dozens > of crap patches to prettify the generated crud. > > Not to mention that this would mean having to learn this rest crud in > order to write these comments. > > All things I'm not prepared to do. > > I'm all for useful comments, but I see no value _at_all_ in this > generated nonsense. The only reason I sometimes use the docbook comment > style is because its fairly uniform and the build bot gets you a warning > when your function signature no longer matches with the comment. But > if you make this painful I'll simply stop using them. I see plenty of value in the generated documentation, but I see zero return on investment in spending any time trying to convince you about any of it. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-12 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-05-12 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-13 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-05-13 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-13 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-15 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-15 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-15 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-15 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-15 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> - 2017-05-15 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-05-15 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-16 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-15 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-16 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com> - 2017-05-16 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-05-13 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/36] mutex, futex: adjust kernel-doc markups to generate ReST Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-13 00:20 +0200
csiph-web