Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642945
| From | Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Document how optimized kprobes are removed from module unload |
| Date | 2017-05-17 06:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHYrE-6Bi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tHPRn-M2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHWg9-4ZC-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHXcd-5H2-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 16 May 2017 22:46:02 -0400 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Wed, 17 May 2017 10:47:07 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, 16 May 2017 14:58:35 -0400 > > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > > > > > From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > > > > Thomas discovered a bug where the kprobe trace tests had a race > > > condition where the kprobe_optimizer called from a delayed work queue > > > that does the optimizing and "unoptimizing" of a kprobe, can try to > > > modify the text after it has been freed by the init code. > > > > > > The kprobe trace selftest is a special case, and Thomas and myself > > > investigated to see if there's a chance that this could also be a bug > > > with module unloading, as the code is not obvious to how it handles > > > this. After adding lots of printks, I figured it out. Thomas suggested > > > that this should be commented so that others will not have to go > > > through this exercise again. > > > > > > > OK, and I prefer this comment to move into kill_kprobe() right > > before calling kill_optimized_kprobe() because that actually > > does it. > > Actually, I can add a comment in both places. I didn't put it into > kill_kprobe() because, yes that's where it is done. I placed it in the > module handler because that's where one will look to see if module > unloading doesn't have any race conditions with the delayed handling. OK, I see. Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> Thanks, > > -- Steve > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> > > > --- > > > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c > > > index 7367e0e..ac386f6 100644 > > > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c > > > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c > > > @@ -2183,6 +2183,12 @@ static int kprobes_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, > > > * The vaddr this probe is installed will soon > > > * be vfreed buy not synced to disk. Hence, > > > * disarming the breakpoint isn't needed. > > > + * > > > + * Note, this will also move any optimized probes > > > + * that are pending to be removed from their > > > + * corresponding lists to the freeing_list and > > > + * will not be touched by the delayed > > > + * kprobe_optimizer work handler. > > > */ > > > kill_kprobe(p); > > > } > > > > > -- Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] kprobes: Document how optimized kprobes are removed from module unload Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-05-16 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Document how optimized kprobes are removed from module unload Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-05-17 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Document how optimized kprobes are removed from module unload Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-05-17 04:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Document how optimized kprobes are removed from module unload Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-05-17 06:10 +0200
csiph-web