Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1642291
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function |
| Date | 2017-05-16 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tHFIm-36E-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tDLW1-2wh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tGcp3-rT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHoHw-sA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHBOp-lH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, On 15/05/2017 at 20:51:30 -0700, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 05/15/2017 06:50 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > > On 05/12/2017 08:37 AM, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > On 05/05/2017 15:50, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > > To avoid possible ECC/parity checksum errors when reading an > > > > uninitialized buffer, the entire Message RAM is initialized when probing > > > > the driver. This initialization is done in the same function reading the > > > > Device Tree properties. > > > > > > > > This patch moves the RAM initialization to a separate function so it can > > > > be called separately from device initialization from Device Tree. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> > > > > > > It's been a week since I sent this patch series. Any comments? > > > > Looks good, added to linux-can-next. > > Isn't this a fix for linux-can instead? > > At least it would make no sense to me to have the upgraded M_CAN driver in > Linux 4.12 without this fix. > The related suspend mode on the sama5d2 is not present in v4.12 so I think this can wait v4.13. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> - 2017-05-12 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> - 2017-05-15 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> - 2017-05-16 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2017-05-16 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] can: m_can: move Message RAM initialization to function Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net> - 2017-05-16 15:20 +0200
csiph-web