Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1642209

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper

From Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper
Date 2017-05-16 07:20 +0200
Message-ID <tHD3P-1lZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tFgO5-4HS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tGZzs-Q7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHhZn-4vl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tHiiJ-4Th-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Laurent,


On 15-05-2017 08:05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 15 May 2017 08:47:49 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Friday 12 May 2017 17:06:14 Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>> On 12-05-2017 10:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 18:00:12 Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>>>> +		if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
>>>>>> +			mode->status = 
> drm_mode_validate_connector(connector,
>>>>>>  								   
> mode);
>>>>> I would reverse the arguments order to match the style of the other
>>>>> validation functions.
>>>> Hmm, I think it makes more sense to pass connector first and then
>>>> mode ...
>>> I disagree, as this function validates a mode against a pipeline, the same
>>> way the other validation functions validate a mode against other
>>> parameters, but it's your patch :-)
>> Call it drm_connector_validate_mode, because the first argument is
>> generally the object we operate on :-)
> But the function doesn't validate a mode for a connector, it validates a mode 
> for a complete pipeline...
>

Hmm, but note that in the same function there is
drm_mode_validate_size() and drm_mode_validate_flag() calls,
which take as first argument the mode and then the object to
validate (I hadn't seen this). So, maybe leave it as
drm_mode_validate_connector() as it takes a connector as argument
or change to drm_mode_validate_pipeline() as you said, or even
drm_mode_validate_datapath(), drm_mode_validate_videopath(),
drm_mode_validate_components() ?

Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-05-12 11:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector  probe helper Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> - 2017-05-12 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-05-14 13:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector  probe helper Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2017-05-15 08:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2017-05-15 09:10 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector  probe helper Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com> - 2017-05-16 07:20 +0200

csiph-web