Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1640618
| From | Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path |
| Date | 2017-05-12 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tGmeJ-7Jn-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tGmeJ-7Jn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
If load_balance() fails to migrate any tasks because all tasks were
affined, load_balance() removes the source cpu from consideration and
attempts to redo and balance among the new subset of cpus.
There is a bug in this code path where the algorithm considers all active
cpus in the system (minus the source that was just masked out). This is
not valid for two reasons: some active cpus may not be in the current
scheduling domain and one of the active cpus is dst_cpu. These cpus should
not be considered, as we cannot pull load from them.
Instead of failing out of load_balance(), we may end up redoing the search
with no valid cpus and incorrectly concluding the domain is balanced.
Additionally, if the group_imbalance flag was just set, it may also be
incorrectly unset, thus the flag will not be seen by other cpus in future
load_balance() runs as that algorithm intends.
Fix the check by removing cpus not in the current domain and the dst_cpu
from considertation, thus limiting the evaluation to valid remaining cpus
from which load might be migrated.
Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d711093..8f783ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8219,8 +8219,19 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
/* All tasks on this runqueue were pinned by CPU affinity */
if (unlikely(env.flags & LBF_ALL_PINNED)) {
+ struct cpumask tmp;
+
+ /* Cpumask of all initially possible busiest cpus. */
+ cpumask_copy(&tmp, sched_domain_span(env.sd));
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(env.dst_cpu, &tmp);
+
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
- if (!cpumask_empty(cpus)) {
+ /*
+ * Go back to "redo" iff the load-balance cpumask
+ * contains other potential busiest cpus for the
+ * current sched domain.
+ */
+ if (cpumask_intersects(cpus, &tmp)) {
env.loop = 0;
env.loop_break = sched_nr_migrate_break;
goto redo;
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-12 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-12 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-12 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-12 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-12 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-12 22:50 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-12 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2017-05-15 17:00 +0200
Re: [RFC 1/2] sched/fair: Fix load_balance() affinity redo path Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org> - 2017-05-18 16:40 +0200
csiph-web