Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1637964

Re: [PATCH 0/4] S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/07/17 19:12, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Sun, 7 May 2017 19:00:09 +0200
>
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (4):
>   Combine two function calls into one in show_cacheinfo()
>   Use seq_putc() in show_cpu_summary()
>   Replace six seq_printf() calls by seq_puts()
>   Combine two function calls into one at four places
>
>  arch/s390/kernel/cache.c     |  4 ++--
>  arch/s390/kernel/processor.c |  2 +-
>  arch/s390/kernel/sysinfo.c   | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>

I'm sorry, I wouldn't normally respond to this, but I was put on the Cc
after all so I'll give my feedback.

I think these patches are a waste of time and a resources.

It would be different if your patches fixed actual bugs. This is just
mindless code transformations that MAY in the best case save a few bytes
of code here and there (I don't know; you didn't say).

But the potential gains from these incredibly numerous and tiny patches
that don't fix anything are so small, it's a waste of time, bandwidth,
and mental capacity for you and for everybody involved.

I just searched my inbox for patches from you and you sent literally
_hundreds_ over the past few days, all doing this crazy printf/puts/putc
transformation.

Another bit of searching and I see that I'm not the first one giving you
this response:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/23/383 - Jens Axboe
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/23/262 - Johannes Thumshirn
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/12/513 - Cyrille Pitchen
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/24/491 - Theodore Ts'o
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/7/148 - Dan Carpenter
https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/14/58 - Christian Borntraeger

...and I'm sure there are many more.


Vegard

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/4] S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-08 01:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/4] S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2017-05-09 10:10 +0200
    Re: S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-09 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/4] S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-05-09 12:40 +0200
      Re: S390: Fine-tuning for six function implementations SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-05-09 13:00 +0200

csiph-web