Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1637789
| From | Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] i2c: aspeed: added driver for Aspeed I2C |
| Date | 2017-05-09 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tF0pX-25o-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tzQUi-21B-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzQUi-21B-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Sorry for the spam everyone, email client did not do what I expected it to do.
I would like to release another version this week or next week, and I
think that we are pretty closed to having something we can apply, but
before I do that, I want to get something resolved:
> +static int __aspeed_i2c_init(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus,
> + struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Disable everything. */
> + writel(0, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> +
> + ret = __aspeed_i2c_init_clk(bus, pdev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /* Enable Master Mode */
> + writel(readl(bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG) |
> + ASPEED_I2CD_MASTER_EN |
> + /* TODO: provide device tree option for multi-master mode. */
I am curious what everyone thinks about this. It seemed that, earlier
on, people did not like me disabling multi-master mode, but I think
that it would make bus recovery not work as well. Given that, I think
it makes the most sense to provide a device tree option either to
enable multi-master support or disable it. Thoughts?
> + ASPEED_I2CD_MULTI_MASTER_DIS,
> + bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_FUN_CTRL_REG);
> +
> + /* Set interrupt generation of I2C controller */
> + writel(ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_ALL, bus->base + ASPEED_I2C_INTR_CTRL_REG);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v7 4/5] i2c: aspeed: added driver for Aspeed I2C Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> - 2017-05-09 01:40 +0200
csiph-web