Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1637544
| From | "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: add code comment for clarification |
| Date | 2017-05-08 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tETou-69K-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tDuBP-7PK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDvex-8iS-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tESVs-5Jx-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi David, Quoting David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>: > From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> > Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 14:44:16 -0500 > >> @@ -389,6 +389,12 @@ static int sk_diag_fill(struct sock *sk, >> struct sk_buff *skb, >> nlmsg_flags, unlh, net_admin); >> } >> >> +/* >> + * Ignore the position of the arguments req->id.idiag_dport and >> + * req->id.idiag_sport in both calls to inet_lookup() and inet6_lookup() >> + * functions, once this is a locked in behavior exposed to user space. >> + * Changing this will break things for people. >> + */ > > This is implicit for every interface exposed to userspace. > > Therefore, saying it here and there in various comments provides > questionable value. > > And in fact I think these arguments are probably in the correct order. > > I'm definitely not applying a patch like this, sorry. I get it, thanks for clarifying. -- Gustavo A. R. Silva
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[net-ipv4] question about arguments position "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-04 18:10 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-05-04 18:50 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-04 19:50 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-04 21:10 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-05-04 21:20 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-04 21:30 +0200
[PATCH] net: ipv4: add code comment for clarification "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-04 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: add code comment for clarification David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-05-08 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] net: ipv4: add code comment for clarification "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-08 18:10 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-04 21:20 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-04 21:50 +0200
Re: [net-ipv4] question about arguments position "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com> - 2017-05-04 20:00 +0200
csiph-web