Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1637062

Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility

From hpa@zytor.com
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility
Date 2017-05-08 00:10 +0200
Message-ID <tECxj-3oj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <tDPGi-4Wu-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDQsF-5uu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDRf4-63i-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDSb8-6HT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tE36x-5Bj-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On May 6, 2017 1:16:35 AM PDT, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 01:36:34PM -0700, Michael Davidson wrote:
>
>> There are a few lingering places in the kernel which use variable
>> length arrays in structs (eg the raid10 driver) which don't build
>with
>> clang and that is about it.
>
>So the other point I raised is lack of asm goto (and asm flags output).
>
>Without that our static key infrastructure reverts to runtime branches
>and affects performance.
>
>> So, while I completely understand the resistance to adding arbitrary
>> hacks to the kernel just to support another compiler it is important
>> to also understand just how close things are to "just working".
>
>Reading up on the LLVM thread on asm goto they appear to want to
>provide
>an intrinsic to allow doing the patchable branch thing. That would be
>fairly limiting, and the proposal I've seen doesn't even cover the two
>(or rather 4) states of patchable branches we have in the kernel.
>
>Not to mention that such an intrinsic doesn't even begin to cover all
>the other (perhaps creative) uses we have got asm goto used.
>
>But my main point is that we'd have to rewrite and maintain _two_
>versions of the static key infrastructure if we were to support LLVM's
>intrinsic and the GCC asm goto. That is a very undesirable place to be.
>
>So while they'll say they support the feature, I'll say its worthless
>since I'm not inclined to support their variant of it. As is, I'm not
>getting the feeling the LLVM team really cares about Linux.

This has been a common problem with LLVM: they say that they will provide feature compatibility with gcc, but then they say this or that gcc extension "doesn't make sense" and is something they don't want to support.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] x86/mm/kaslr: Use _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> - 2017-05-02 00:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] x86/mm/kaslr: Use _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-05-02 04:10 +0200
  [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility tip-bot for Matthias Kaehlcke <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-05-05 10:30 +0200
    Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-05 12:30 +0200
      Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-05-05 20:00 +0200
        Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-05 20:30 +0200
        Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> - 2017-05-05 20:50 +0200
          Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-05 21:40 +0200
            Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Michael Davidson <md@google.com> - 2017-05-05 22:40 +0200
              Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-06 10:20 +0200
                Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility hpa@zytor.com - 2017-05-08 00:10 +0200
            Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> - 2017-05-05 23:00 +0200
              Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-05-06 12:00 +0200
          Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility hpa@zytor.com - 2017-05-05 22:00 +0200
            Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm/kaslr: Use the _ASM_MUL macro for  multiplication to work around Clang incompatibility Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> - 2017-05-05 23:30 +0200

csiph-web