Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1635372
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Updates for v4.12 |
| Date | 2017-05-04 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tDedI-57T-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tCPIm-4Ud-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> This will conflict with changes I have already sent to you. They may
> not be so trivial to fix. I merged my urgent branch when pushing to
> linux-next. You can look at how I resolved the conflicts in my
> "for-next" branch, specifically sha1: f96d18dee6f09486b944b75f6151d36381f396b5
Hmm. My merge resolution is different, but I think I did it right.
Yours does
ret = alloc_snapshot(&global_trace);
and I think it should be
ret = alloc_snapshot(tr);
but you should double-check it. I only looked at the code, I didn't
actually *test* anything.
(There's a few other differences, but they are just ordering of the
function declarations).
Btw, I'd prefer to *not* see the full patch in the pull request if
it's this big. For small stuff, sure. For a multi-thousand-line patch?
I'm not reading those in a mail-reader anyway.
Linus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Updates for v4.12 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-05-04 04:00 +0200 Re: [GIT PULL] tracing: Updates for v4.12 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-05-04 04:20 +0200
csiph-web