Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1635287
| From | Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: handle signal case as failure |
| Date | 2017-05-03 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tDaa6-2vi-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tD0aL-4bC-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi all,
Le 03/05/2017 à 11:53, Nicholas Mc Guire a écrit :
> The problem is that stm32_qspi_wait_cmd() will indicate success in case of
> being interrupted. The if condition is incomplete here as
> wait_for_copletion_interruptible_timeout can return -ERESTARTSYS but this
> is not handled by if(!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout()).
> While somewhat unlikely it probably would be hard to figure out what went
> wrong if the signal case does occur.
>
> Fixes: commit 0d43d7ab277a ("mtd: spi-nor: add driver for STM32 quad spi flash controller")
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
> ---
> Problem found by experimental coccinelle script
>
> Its not clear if its sufficient to simply treat this case as failure or
> if it might need some debug output to allow differentiation of signal
> and timeout case.
>
> Patch was compile tested with: stm32_defconfig +CONFIG_MTD=y, CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR=y,
> CONFIG_SPI_STM32_QUADSPI=m
>
> Patch is against v4.11-rc8 (localversion-next is next-20170503)
>
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/stm32-quadspi.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/stm32-quadspi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/stm32-quadspi.c
> index 1056e74..27147ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/stm32-quadspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/stm32-quadspi.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ static int stm32_qspi_wait_cmd(struct stm32_qspi *qspi)
> {
> u32 cr;
> int err = 0;
> + long timeout = 0;
>
> if (readl_relaxed(qspi->io_base + QUADSPI_SR) & SR_TCF)
> return 0;
> @@ -167,8 +168,13 @@ static int stm32_qspi_wait_cmd(struct stm32_qspi *qspi)
> cr = readl_relaxed(qspi->io_base + QUADSPI_CR);
> writel_relaxed(cr | CR_TCIE, qspi->io_base + QUADSPI_CR);
>
> - if (!wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&qspi->cmd_completion,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
Ludovic, can we just use wait_for_completion_timeout() instead?
I think so but you surely know better than me :)
Do you plan to receive signal? maybe to abort the current SPI flash command?
Best regards,
Cyrille
> + timeout = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(
> + &qspi->cmd_completion, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +
> + /* since the calling side only cares about success of failure
> + * returning -ETIMEDOUT even when interrupted should be ok here
> + */
> + if (timeout == 0 || timeout == -ERESTARTSYS)
> err = -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> writel_relaxed(cr, qspi->io_base + QUADSPI_CR);
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: handle signal case as failure Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> - 2017-05-03 13:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: handle signal case as failure Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr> - 2017-05-03 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: handle signal case as failure Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@st.com> - 2017-05-04 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: handle signal case as failure Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> - 2017-05-05 12:00 +0200
csiph-web