Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1636190
| From | Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. |
| Date | 2017-05-05 08:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tDF4d-6re-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tDh1T-73a-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tDEBc-6eY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | NXP |
On Fri, 2017-05-05 at 08:01 +0200, Karim Eshapa wrote: > > On 5/4/2017 5:07 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 06:58 +0200, Karim Eshapa wrote: > > > > + stop = jiffies + 10000; > > > > + /* > > > > + * if MR was full and h/w had other FQRNI entries to produce, we > > > > + * need to allow it time to produce those entries once the > > > > + * existing entries are consumed. A worst-case situation > > > > + * (fully-loaded system) means h/w sequencers may have to do 3-4 > > > > + * other things before servicing the portal's MR pump, each of > > > > + * which (if slow) may take ~50 qman cycles (which is ~200 > > > > + * processor cycles). So rounding up and then multiplying this > > > > + * worst-case estimate by a factor of 10, just to be > > > > + * ultra-paranoid, goes as high as 10,000 cycles. NB, we consume > > > > + * one entry at a time, so h/w has an opportunity to produce new > > > > + * entries well before the ring has been fully consumed, so > > > > + * we're being *really* paranoid here. > > > > + */ > > > > > > OK, upon reading this more closely it seems the intent was to delay for > > > 10,000 > > > *processor cycles* and somehow that got turned into 10,000 jiffies > > > (which is > > > 40 seconds at the default Hz!). We could just replace this whole thing > > > with > > > msleep(1) and still be far more paranoid than was originally intended. > > > > > > Claudiu and Roy, any comments? > > > > Yes the timing here is certainly off, the code changed a few times since > > the comment was originally written. > > An msleep(1) seems reasonable here to me. > > If the previous patch with msleep(1) is OK. > can I send a patch to slightly change the comments. Yes. -Scott
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 21:50 +0200
[PATCH] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: unsigned long jiffies value. Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: unsigned long jiffies value. Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2017-04-30 01:40 +0200
RE:drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: unsigned long jiffies value Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 03:20 +0200
[PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 07:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2017-05-04 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com> - 2017-05-05 01:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH v3] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 07:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Karim Eshapa <karim.eshapa@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] drivers:soc:fsl:qbman:qman.c: Sleep instead of stuck hacking jiffies. Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2017-05-05 08:40 +0200
csiph-web