Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1633815
| From | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs |
| Date | 2017-05-01 21:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tCoRQ-4ze-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tAjjz-3pN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCmZH-3ry-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCmZH-3ry-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello, On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > n/m, I need to stop staring at a screen. Wrapping those two sites in > rcu_read_lock() achieves the very same. > > So we want the rcu_read_lock() to serialize against sched_free_group, > but don't need the new ->online thing and can retain the ->on_list > stuff. Or I've completely lost the plot (which is entirely possible...) > > I'll stare at this again tomorrow So, the rcu_read_lock() thing protects against sched_free_group() and thanks to the order of operations, all online cfs_rq's are guaranteed to be visbile in the two callbacks; however, nothing prevents the code paths from seeing already dead cfs_rqs, which *may* be okay if the code paths are safe to run on dead and unlinked cfs_rqs, but it's still nasty and fragile. The new ->online condition which is synchronized by rq->lock guarantees that both functions only process live ones. We need something synchronized by rq->lock to guarantee this whether that's a new list entry or a flag like ->online. It'd be better to encapsulate and document this iteration. Thanks. -- tejun
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-04-26 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-01 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-01 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-01 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-01 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-05-04 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Use task_groups instead of leaf_cfs_rq_list to walk all cfs_rqs Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-05-04 19:40 +0200
csiph-web