Re: [RFC] AT_NO_JUMPS/LOOKUP_NO_JUMPS

From	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC] AT_NO_JUMPS/LOOKUP_NO_JUMPS
Date	2017-05-02 22:50 +0200
Message-ID	<tCMUa-3a8-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tmMOt-wC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tCM7M-2F9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Sun 2017-03-19 17:24:15, Al Viro wrote:
> > 	Bringing back an old conversation - what do you think about the
> > potential usefulness of the following ...at() option:
> > 	* no mountpoint crossings allowed (mount --bind included)
> 
> Returning error or returning the object that should be hidden by the
> mount?

Error, obviously - as clearly said a few lines below...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC] AT_NO_JUMPS/LOOKUP_NO_JUMPS Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-05-02 22:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC] AT_NO_JUMPS/LOOKUP_NO_JUMPS Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-05-02 22:50 +0200

csiph-web