Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1633196

Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow

From "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow
Date 2017-04-29 00:50 +0200
Message-ID <tBmS5-5Fv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tAb2F-6Ff-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAdHb-8nI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tBgMF-1o8-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Sabrina,

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> wrote:
> One small thing here: since you're touching this comment, could you
> move it next to skb_to_sgvec, since that's the function it's supposed
> to document?

Done. I'll wait until next week to resubmit, to give some more time
for comments, but my current living copy of this series is here:
https://git.zx2c4.com/linux-dev/log/?h=jd/safe-skb-vec

One thing I'm considering, after discussing with David Laight, is the
potential of just using an explicit stack array for pushing and
popping skbs, rather than using the call stack. While this increases
complexity, which I'm opposed to, David makes the point that on some
architectures, the stack frame is rather large, and 32 function calls
of recursion might not be a good idea. Any opinons on this? Overkill
and simplicity is preferred? Or in fact best practice? (Either way,
I'll do a trial implementation of it to get an idea of how the end
result feels.)

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 16:10 +0200
  [PATCH v2 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 16:20 +0200
    [PATCH v3 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 16:30 +0200
  [PATCH 2/5] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 16:20 +0200
  [PATCH 4/5] macsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 16:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-25 16:50 +0200
    [PATCH v4 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 17:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-25 17:20 +0200
        [PATCH v5 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
          [PATCH v5 3/5] rxrpc: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
          [PATCH v5 4/5] macsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
          [PATCH v5 2/5] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
          [PATCH v5 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 18:00 +0200
          [PATCH v6 2/5] ipsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 20:50 +0200
          [PATCH v6 4/5] macsec: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 20:50 +0200
          [PATCH v6 5/5] virtio_net: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 20:50 +0200
          [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 20:50 +0200
            [PATCH v6 3/5] rxrpc: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-25 20:50 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] rxrpc: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> - 2017-04-28 13:50 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] rxrpc: check return value of skb_to_sgvec always "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-28 15:40 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-27 11:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> - 2017-04-27 13:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-27 14:10 +0200
                RE: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2017-04-27 17:00 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-27 18:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net> - 2017-04-28 18:20 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to  prevent overflow "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2017-04-29 00:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/5] skbuff: return -EMSGSIZE in skb_to_sgvec to prevent  overflow Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> - 2017-04-25 17:50 +0200

csiph-web