Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1631465
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains |
| Date | 2017-04-26 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAvE5-2Zp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <tvFE5-6Oa-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tvNii-3GT-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx7oC-5as-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <txDRw-8e8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAmU9-5O3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 10:02:39AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > On 17/04/17 06:27, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >>> If we are looking this power-domains with performance as just some > >>> *advanced regulators*, I don't like the complexity added. > + Mark > I don;t see any public discussions on why we ruled out using regulators to > support this but maybe there were some offline discussions on this. > Mark, this is a long thread, so just summarizing here to give you the context. > At qualcomm, we have an external M3 core (running its own firmware) which controls > a few voltage rails (including AVS on those). The devices vote for the voltage levels > (or performance levels) they need by passing an integer value to the M3 (not actual > voltage values). Since that didn't fit well with the existing regulator apis it was As I'm getting fed up of saying: if the values you are setting are not voltages and do not behave like voltages then the hardware should not be represented as a voltage regulator since if they are represented as voltage regulators things will expect to be able to control them as voltage regulators. This hardware is quite clearly providing OPPs directly, I would expect this to be handled in the OPP code somehow.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-26 06:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-04-26 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-27 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-27 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-28 07:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-28 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-28 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-04-30 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-05-03 13:30 +0200
csiph-web