RE: Performance of low-cpu utilisation benchmark regressed severely since 4.6

From	"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	RE: Performance of low-cpu utilisation benchmark regressed severely since 4.6
Date	2017-04-25 23:10 +0200
Message-ID	<tAfSF-1qD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(3 earlier) <tzrMd-1Lw-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzAwa-7NE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzNa3-87g-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA2Vr-1xZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAfSF-1qD-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Rafael,

Apologies, I reversed reported a couple of data points last night:

On 2017.04.25 00:13 Doug wrote:
> On 2017.04.24 07:25 Doug wrote:
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
>> Plus that patch is in progress.
>
>3387.76 Seconds.
> Idle power 3.85 watts.
>
> Other potentially interesting information for 2 hour idle test:
> Driver called 21209 times. Maximum duration 2396 Seconds. Minimum duration 20 mSec. 

Wrong, should read:

Driver called 21209 times. Maximum duration 2510 Seconds. Minimum duration 0.587 mSec.

> Compared to kernel 4.11-rc7 (passive mode, schedutil governor)
> 3297.82 (re-stated from a previous e-mail)
> Idle power 3.81 watts
>
> Other potentially interesting information for 2 hour idle test:
> Driver called 1631 times. Maximum duration 2510 Seconds. Minimum duration 0.587 mSec.

Wrong, should read:

Driver called 1631 times. Maximum duration 2396 Seconds. Minimum duration 20 mSec.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RE: Performance of low-cpu utilisation benchmark regressed severely since 4.6 "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2017-04-25 23:10 +0200

csiph-web