Re: [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers

From	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers
Date	2017-04-25 22:10 +0200
Message-ID	<tAeWB-Q9-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <twgtX-5QX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <txgUW-2mc-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <txheh-2tc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <txCiK-7dQ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <txCLL-7nt-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Intel Corporation

Show all headers | View raw

> That is where we disagree. I do not see bitstream as firmware. For instance
> now you can run OpenCL on some FPGA, so this is exactly like GPU we should
> request open source stack from OpenCL down to bitstream.

It's an accelerator with a bunch of firmwares where you load the right
one. We've got lots of those in Linux already. Your GPU probably needs
firmware as well in just the same way.

> For me this is not enough (tool to load bitstream).

Unfortunately that isn't likely to change for any major FPGA device in
the near future. If you could load arbitrary bit patterns into an FPGA
then in most cases that also means you could physically destroy the
hardware.

Alan

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2017-04-25 22:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> - 2017-05-01 18:50 +0200

csiph-web