Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1630808

Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory

From Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory
Date 2017-04-25 19:10 +0200
Message-ID <tAc8q-7wp-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (13 earlier) <twVnr-5TD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx1jb-12F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzGLg-45f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzOSu-O4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA2iL-148-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 25/04/17 12:30 AM, Knut Omang wrote:
> Yes, that's why I used 'significant'. One good thing is that given resources 
> it can easily be done in parallel with other development, and will give additional
> insight of some form.

Yup, well if someone wants to start working on an emulated RDMA device
that actually simulates proper DMA transfers that would be great!

>> I also imagine it would be quite difficult to develop those models
>> given the array of hardware that needs to be supported and the deep
>> functional knowledge required to figure out appropriate restrictions.
> 
> From my naive perspective it seems it need not even be a full model to get some benefits,
> just low level functionality tests with some instances of a
> device that offers some MMIO space 'playground'.

Yes, the nvme device in qemu has a CMB buffer which is a good choice to
test with but we don't have code to use it for p2p transfers in the
kernel so it is a bit awkward. We also posted [1] to qemu which was also
handy to test with using a small out of tree module. But I don't see a
lot of value in it if you completely ignore any hardware quirks.

Logan

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg04331.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> - 2017-04-25 08:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-25 19:10 +0200
    Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory "Stephen  Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com> - 2017-04-25 23:30 +0200

csiph-web