Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1630808
| From | Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory |
| Date | 2017-04-25 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tAc8q-7wp-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <twVnr-5TD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx1jb-12F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzGLg-45f-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzOSu-O4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tA2iL-148-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 25/04/17 12:30 AM, Knut Omang wrote: > Yes, that's why I used 'significant'. One good thing is that given resources > it can easily be done in parallel with other development, and will give additional > insight of some form. Yup, well if someone wants to start working on an emulated RDMA device that actually simulates proper DMA transfers that would be great! >> I also imagine it would be quite difficult to develop those models >> given the array of hardware that needs to be supported and the deep >> functional knowledge required to figure out appropriate restrictions. > > From my naive perspective it seems it need not even be a full model to get some benefits, > just low level functionality tests with some instances of a > device that offers some MMIO space 'playground'. Yes, the nvme device in qemu has a CMB buffer which is a good choice to test with but we don't have code to use it for p2p transfers in the kernel so it is a bit awkward. We also posted [1] to qemu which was also handy to test with using a small out of tree module. But I don't see a lot of value in it if you completely ignore any hardware quirks. Logan [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-10/msg04331.html
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory Knut Omang <knut.omang@oracle.com> - 2017-04-25 08:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2017-04-25 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC 0/8] Copy Offload with Peer-to-Peer PCI Memory "Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com> - 2017-04-25 23:30 +0200
csiph-web